1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Peugeot 308
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 308 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 308 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 308 (89 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 308 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 308, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 308 (100 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2012 Peugeot 308 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2012 Peugeot 308 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 40 | 308 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |