1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A

To start off, 1966 Austin A 60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 60 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1948 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 60 1948 Jeep CJ3A
Make Austin Jeep
Model A 60 CJ3A
Year Released 1966 1948
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1622 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 60 HP 59 HP
Torque 123 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2040 mm