1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1966 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 60 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
