1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1974 Daihatsu Charmant
To start off, 1974 Daihatsu Charmant is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Daihatsu Charmant (62 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Daihatsu Charmant should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 60 weights approximately 208 kg more than 1974 Daihatsu Charmant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Austin A 60 (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Daihatsu Charmant. (114 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Daihatsu Charmant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 1974 Daihatsu Charmant | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | A 60 | Charmant |
Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2340 mm |