1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 70 kg more than 1966 Austin A 60.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Austin A 60 (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |