1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1985 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1985 Fiat Panda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Panda. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 60 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1985 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 1985 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 60 | Panda |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 44 HP |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 64.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 35 L |