1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1966 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Austin A 60 (123 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1966 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 60 | 1989 Citroen XM | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | A 60 | XM |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2470 mm |
