1966 Austin A 60 vs. 1995 Ford Probe
To start off, 1995 Ford Probe is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Probe weights approximately 225 kg more than 1966 Austin A 60.
Because 1966 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Probe (218 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 1995 Ford Probe | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | Probe |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 218 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 84.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 74.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 55 L |