1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (150 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60.
Because 1966 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 2000 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 60 | Neon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |