1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 60 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |