1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 60 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1966 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Acty (139 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm). This means 2002 Honda Acty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 60 | Acty |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |