1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 165 kg more than 1966 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |