1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2007 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander (240 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60.
Because 1966 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chevrolet Uplander (325 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 60 | 2007 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Uplander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |