1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 60 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 60 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
