1966 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2011 Nissan Titan is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Titan (317 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 60.
Because 2011 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 60. (123 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 60 | 2011 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 60 | Titan |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 317 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 106 L |
