1966 Austin A 90 vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 Austin A 90 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 182 kg more than 1966 Austin A 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 90 | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 90 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3210 mm |
