1966 Austin A 90 vs. 1955 Ford F
To start off, 1966 Austin A 90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford F should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford F weights approximately 470 kg more than 1966 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 90 | 1955 Ford F | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 90 | F |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2040 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3000 mm |
