1966 Austin A 90 vs. 1973 Chrysler Charger

To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 90 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (318 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 90. (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 90 1973 Chrysler Charger
Make Austin Chrysler
Model A 90 Charger
Year Released 1966 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 4014 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 222 Nm 318 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2680 mm