1966 Austin A 90 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 90. (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 90 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | A 90 | Etna |
Year Released | 1966 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 69.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2520 mm |