1966 Austin A 90 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90.
Because 1966 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 90. (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 90 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 90 | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |