1966 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90.
Because 1966 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 90. (222 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 90 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Austin | Audi |
Model | A 90 | A5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 67 L |