1966 Austin A 90 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 90. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 90.
Because 1966 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Austin A 90 (222 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1966 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 90 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 90 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2685 mm |
