1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1949 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1949 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | 62 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3210 mm |
