1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1952 Ferrari 340 MM
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ferrari 340 MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ferrari 340 MM would be higher. At 4,102 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 91 kg more than 1952 Ferrari 340 MM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ferrari |
Model | 3000 Mk III | 340 MM |
Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 4102 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1089 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2510 mm |