1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 915 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
| Model | 3000 Mk III | 62 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3300 mm |
