1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud

To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 920 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III has manual transmission. 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
Make Austin-Healey Rolls-Royce
Model 3000 Mk III Silver Cloud
Year Released 1966 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 6230 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 146 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 195 km/hour 187 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 2100 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 5380 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 3130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 81 L