1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 1974 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 1974 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Chevrolet Corvette (195 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Chevrolet Corvette (373 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. (165 Nm). This means 1974 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 1974 Chevrolet Corvette | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | 3000 Mk III | Corvette |
Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2500 mm |