1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III vs. 2004 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 430 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | 2004 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | 3000 Mk III | AZ |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2370 mm |