1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1952 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Buick |
| Model | Sprite | 40 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3090 mm |
