1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1964 Innocenti IM 3
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Innocenti IM 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Innocenti IM 3 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Innocenti IM 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1964 Innocenti IM 3 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Innocenti |
Model | Sprite | IM 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1096 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2380 mm |