1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1968 Trabant P 601
To start off, 1968 Trabant P 601 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 565 kg more than 1968 Trabant P 601.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1968 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Trabant |
Model | Sprite | P 601 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 24 L |