1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1983 Chrysler Executive
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Executive is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 190 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1983 Chrysler Executive | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
Model | Sprite | Executive |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2554 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3160 mm |