1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1987 Renault 4
To start off, 1987 Renault 4 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 485 kg more than 1987 Renault 4.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1987 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Sprite | 4 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2410 mm |
