1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1989 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1989 Jaguar XJR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,996 cc (12 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 620 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1989 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
| Model | Sprite | XJR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 91 L |
