1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1999 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1999 Lancia Kappa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,929 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1999 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lancia |
Model | Sprite | Kappa |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |