1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2001 Daewoo Vada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Daewoo |
| Model | Sprite | Vada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |
