1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2001 Nissan Almera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Almera weights approximately 190 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | Almera |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |