1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,398 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 540 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3270 mm |
