1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sprite | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3010 mm |