1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 245 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Sprite | Tribute |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |