1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2003 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 543 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |