1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2003 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2003 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sprite | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3010 mm |