1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |