1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2007 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2007 Smart ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 440 kg more than 2007 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2007 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Smart |
Model | Sprite | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 33 L |