1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Sprite | CTS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |