1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Sprite | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 76 L |