1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2009 Lada Niva
To start off, 2009 Lada Niva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,688 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada Niva weights approximately 105 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2009 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2009 Lada Niva | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lada |
Model | Sprite | Niva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 45 L |