1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2010 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2010 Ford Taurus is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2010 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sprite | Taurus |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |