1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi TT weights approximately 290 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Audi |
| Model | Sprite | TT |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
