1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2011 Honda Fit
To start off, 2011 Honda Fit is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 48 kg more than 2011 Honda Fit.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2011 Honda Fit | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
Model | Sprite | Fit |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 40 L |